Submissions are always open.
This blog touches on some other social justice issues, but mainly focuses on the Pro-Choice movement.
Welcome! :)
Call me Audrey
Let's be friends and talk about stuff
1/24 »
Report this ass.
Their entire tumblr advocates for using rape, assault and other forms of violence to “keep women in their place.”
If you are triggered by repeated imagery of rape and abuse. I highly suggest you DO NOT visit their tumblr.
It’s disgusting.
I went onto this blog for less than a second before clicking ‘close’, if you are disturbed by certain images and/or get triggered easily by mention of rape, then please don’t click on this blog. Just trust us and report it!
(Source: gynocraticgrrl, via dancing-painted-bears)
Thank you Dr. George Tiller. Thank you for your service to women in their most desperate times. Your dedication will never be forgotten.
RIP
(via stfuprolife)
I can’t tell you how much nicer the pro choice tag is with the likes of nikosnature and standingfast blocked on my list.If I had missing-e I would blacklist them too… maybe I will.
I blocked niko a long time ago and I blocked standingfast when I realized they don’t answer asks if you’re winning an argument with them. It strikes me as dishonest to only publish asks when you feel that you can make yourself look superior to the person talking to you.
I have neither of them blocked and am still messaging standingfast mostly because I’m a masochist. Niko actually follows me which is hilarious because I pay attention to him only when I try to insult him into unfollowing, and in the only post he ever reblogged from me he tried to prove to an adopted person how adoption is always better than abortion and received a BURNING response from the OP, to which he STRANGELY ENOUGH never paid any attention to.
wow, really? How long ago was that, because I’m actually very interested in what the adopted person had to say to his bullshit arguments. Or at least, do you know the url of the OP?
I can’t tell you how much nicer the pro choice tag is with the likes of nikosnature and standingfast blocked on my list.If I had missing-e I would blacklist them too… maybe I will.
I blocked niko a long time ago and I blocked standingfast when I realized they don’t answer asks if you’re winning an argument with them. It strikes me as dishonest to only publish asks when you feel that you can make yourself look superior to the person talking to you.
yes I agree, they only post things when they think they have a clever response to, or a bible quote that backs up their argument.
I can’t tell you how much nicer the pro choice tag is with the likes of nikosnature and standingfast blocked on my list.
If I had missing-e I would blacklist them too… maybe I will.
I’m done talking to nikosnature. He keeps using the “we shouldn’t kill people” defense and it’s getting painfully stupid.
someone want to take over? He just reblogged my argument and it’s going around in circles and he’s recycling arguments.
yes I know. Isn’t that the same with all pro-choice/anti-choice arguments? I’ve already made a lengthy post a while ago about how I think a fetus is not a child, biologically and just mentally, but tbh I’m too lazy to go back and find it or repeat what I said.
Also I’m not only arguing personhood, but the actual rights of the woman* which he wants to deny them of.
I really hate comparing abortion to ANYTHING- not just racist stuff like the holocaust.
When anti-choicers say “it’s like ____________” or “how about if ____________”
Shut the fuck up
I mean it’s the same with pro-choicers sometimes when they say “getting into a car doesn’t consent to being injured in a car accident”, and they’re all true, but the only thing we need to be arguing in terms of abortion is the rights of the women* and how if we lose these rights we lose everything we have: our body, our integrity, our choice, our lives.
Comparing abortion to anything that isn’t abortion is a shitty move and a weak argument, to be honest.
I agree. I’ve tried in the past to refrain from comparing abortion to other things, but I’ll be sure to make a more conscious effort in the future.
I know I’ve done this many times before, but I think we do it because it’s just easy… but often times, I’m not sure if everyone’s noticed, but the argument gets really complex and weird once comparisons are brought in and nothing makes sense after that, because we’re really not discussing the main issue, but something totally different.
I really hate comparing abortion to ANYTHING- not just racist stuff like the holocaust.
When anti-choicers say “it’s like ____________” or “how about if ____________”
Shut the fuck up
I mean it’s the same with pro-choicers sometimes when they say “getting into a car doesn’t consent to being injured in a car accident”, and they’re all true, but the only thing we need to be arguing in terms of abortion is the rights of the women* and how if we lose these rights we lose everything we have: our body, our integrity, our choice, our lives.
Comparing abortion to anything that isn’t abortion is a shitty move and a weak argument, to be honest.
i just love pro-lifers because
they don’t understand that with a little 9th grade Biology
everything becomes clear
and fetuses aren’t alive!
(where the fuck is that “mind blown” gif jesus i’ve been turning all my folders upside down for it)
You are aware of course that a fetus is alive. It is made up of cells that reproduce, show movement, take in nutrients and excrete waste. Those are all hallmarks of being alive.
Oh, pro-choicers.
yes it’s living
so are plants, so is the zit you just popped, the tiny microscopic organisms in pond water.
Know who else is living? The person carrying the fetus. Not only is he/she living, they are actual human BEINGS, with a conscience, a life, a right to choose.
I’m sorry you don’t trust women* to make decisions pertaining to their own bodies.
Right, and cows are living too. And we eat them. And we generally don’t have any qualms about doing so, (unless you’re vegetarian or a Catholic on a Friday in Lent.) The reason for that is that they are not human. Fetuses are human, and since they are alive, human, and beings in their own right, though dependent on the mother, they are human beings.
Sure, a woman has a right to choose, but you know what they say about rights, your right to swing your fist stops where my nose begins. Despite the fact that not all persons have noses, I think the point still stands.
And I do trust women and men to make decisions pertaining to their bodies, I’d just prefer they didn’t make choices that involved killing other people.
I know you have trouble understanding how much work pregnancy, child birth, and maybe even raising a child actually is, but a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body overrules the fetuses right to development within that body.
And if you trusted women* with choice you wouldn’t be advocating for a cause that takes away exactly that.
and your argument became invalid when you finished with “killing other people”. Extracting a fetus from the womb =/= killing a person.
As difficult as pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting is, and I know it is difficult, you can’t say that because it is difficult we can kill people to avoid that situation. For some people paying bills or paying taxes can be really difficult. For some people in some situations, it can even be harder than pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting. It does not follow however, that it is morally acceptable to kill bill and tax collectors in order to avoid that situation. As a society, we can accept that killing people to make our lives easier is not morally acceptable.
A woman’s right to choose ends where the fetus’s nose begins. I think this horse has been shot, beaten, drawn and quartered, drowned, shot again, and turned into jello. This argument that a woman’s right to choose overrules the fetus’s right to life does not work because the right to life is the first and fundamental right.
I do trust women with the choice not to kill their child, that doesn’t mean I don’t like laws to assure that is the case. For example, I trust my roommate not to kill me, however, I also support the current laws in place which criminalize murder which hopefully would dissuade my roommate from the notion of killing me if in fact he was considering it.
A fetus is a person. Abortion kills the fetus. Therefore, abortion kills a person. Unless you can show where my logic fails, or attack one of the two premises, you cannot say that abortion does not kill a person.
You seem to think women have abortions because they’re lazy, or something. As if it’s the easy way out. It’s not. A woman* who find out she’s pregnant- and doesn’t want to be- is actually put in a very stressful situation. You’ll never have to experience it, but it’s probably one of the scariest thing a woman* can encounter in her life.
When we take away a woman’s right to choose what she does with her body, we’re encouraging a patriarchal society where men makes laws governing us.
Sure, an abortion prevents a person from being, but in no way is it actually “killing”.
And no, sorry, but you don’t trust women. You want them to live under your moral standards, rather than what they feel is best for themselves.
